Can there be any justification if the actor of justice gets retribution and not the actor of the crime?: A poem 

I do not hold destiny circumspect; but yes, 

there is a fallout of cause and effect. I am sure 

that people are beginning to believe that there 

is a design in everything, like in times gone by! 

But how should I say is the delivery of comeuppance 

so feeble as time grows to supersede an Age? 

I look to the Sun or the planets and stars to understand  

their metaphorical powers, but feel they are embattled, themselves! 

What is the dignity in being humble…and patient… 

and restrained…and sublime? If we are educated 

in all piety that the grand design never lets the  

righteous down, then, what are the few Bravehearts doing  

in peril? Must I utter my pain in the disbelief that I suffered 

so terribly from a villainy that marked my soul with its 

despicable shadow for aeons and aeons. Am I threadbare  

in my belief(?), for, this could be a pathetic fantasy that seems like 

only ending up in a nightmare? The mythic hero believes 

in revolutions from actions; it is not revenge that is his motivation, 

but justice. How can such altruistic motivation be belittled, then? 

Why does a hero become an antihero because he is always 

under the radar of wicked men who have garnered the power to judge? 

Am I to endorse the wickedness of Anthony Albanese, just because  

I have to contend with a far greater wickedness in Prakash Saint Paul? 

Was it my crime for reacting to each of their crimes against me 

that I was punished for reacting to their crimes against me? And 

what kind of validatory jurisdiction enables criminals to get away  

unscathed, while victims get retribution? I have only answered to duty; 

is that my folly? Is the sacrifice of humility and restraint, deserving of  

punishment? Why are whistleblowers made villains by the law? 

Corrupt men have a psychopathic ability to avoid the law and  

criminalise the victim instead! We have a media (like the Australian Broadcasting 

Corporation) that works solely with the purpose of administering to the side 

which has the cheese for it. How many in the media have ever thought about taking up cudgels  

for the righteous, rather than calumnising the brave warrior and beatifying  

the treacherous? Do the warhorses (zebras) have to fall by the wayside in  

the river crossing because they must fulfill a Masonic destiny? Or does destiny 

ever come with the bridges, that it is meant to? How should I believe, when 

two millennia were lost to the laws of Popes who redefined Godhood in a misconstrual, 

such that the world still believes it must partake in a cannibalism of body and blood 

of the alleged saviour!!! Is belief, then, a passive stalemate that copulates with  

impious, ironical and false legitimacies!